The return of Donald J. Trump to the presidency of the United States after the 2024 election marks the beginning of a new chapter of ambition and unpredictability in American and global politics. In its second term, the Trump administration is poised to implement a bold, domestically focused economic agenda, while recalibrating foreign alliances and trade practices to fulfill its long-standing promise to “return its greatness to America.” Domestically, this mantra continues to prioritize American manufacturing and seeks to limit outsourcing, a strategy aimed at restoring America’s economic self-sufficiency.
An ambitious budget agenda is likely to guide the national discourse, especially as Trump works with top business leaders like Elon Musk, who is expected to lead a new government efficiency commission focused on reducing 2,000 billion dollars out of the $6.8 trillion federal budget. This commission would streamline regulatory processes and reduce government overhead, echoing recent regulatory reforms in India under Prime Minister Modi’s government. Modi’s administration passed the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act in August 2023, which aimed to streamline economic offenses and reduce penalties. The United States, with its vast bureaucracy, faces an even greater task, but success in this area could set a precedent for the private sector’s role in public administration reform.
Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, known for his push for deregulation, may view Musk’s approach in the United States as a valuable model, potentially allowing him to overcome bureaucratic inertia and implement reforms that improve the business environment in India. For Trump, this type of regulatory overhaul could not only boost business confidence domestically, but also attract foreign investment, furthering his goal of reestablishing America as a global manufacturing power.
Trump’s return signals significant changes in U.S. alliances and foreign policy objectives, particularly within NATO and other transatlantic partnerships. A defining feature of his approach to NATO is the insistence on greater financial accountability from European allies, a demand he first expressed during his first term. Trump’s strategy has already prompted Germany to consider conscription, and other NATO countries may soon follow, as they prepare to share the burden of European security. Trump’s approach to NATO funding and military accountability aims not only to reduce U.S. spending but also to assert the United States as a strong, but conditional, ally in the region. This pressure on Europe to strengthen its own security efforts, however, could lead to tensions within the alliance, with some countries likely reluctant to significantly expand their military.
Meanwhile, in Eastern Europe, Trump’s desire to end the protracted war between Russia and Ukraine represents a key foreign policy ambition. A possible diplomatic resolution, which could force kyiv to cede some disputed territories, could allow Moscow to save face, while allowing European nations to move from military involvement to peacebuilding initiatives. However, the United States risks criticism if a peace deal appears to favor Russian interests or undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty. Trump’s likely approach would be pragmatic, recognizing “new red lines” that could lead to an uneasy peace. Such a strategy would allow the United States to refocus its resources elsewhere and exert influence in regions of growing geopolitical importance.
In South Asia, Trump’s policies are poised to reflect a more assertive stance on religious freedoms and human rights, particularly in Bangladesh. His expected support for the region’s Hindu community aligns with his broader commitment to the protection of religious minorities. Chief Advisor Muhammed Yunus of Bangladesh has publicly pledged “peace, harmony, stability and prosperity for all,” but the administration’s actions will be closely watched, particularly amid Growing concerns over “barbaric violence” against the Hindu community. Trump’s policy in this area could go beyond diplomatic statements to put real pressure on regional leaders to ensure the protection of minorities. His stance could even influence Canada’s response to violence against Hindu communities, potentially prompting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to take a more active approach to addressing these issues, as recent incidents have raised concerns about how his administration manages religious tensions.
Another key aspect of Trump’s international strategy will be his engagement with China. Although he is likely to maintain a strong stance against China’s economic practices, President Xi Jinping’s recent assertion that “history has shown that China and the United States benefit from cooperation and suffer of confrontation” could open the door to a cautiously transactional relationship. Trump’s approach will likely prioritize U.S. economic interests while managing tensions in ways that benefit the United States economically and strategically. Trump could push for concessions in trade deals, technology sharing and regional security commitments, with a focus on areas like the Indian Ocean region, where the United States seeks to counterbalance Chinese influence alongside their allies, including India.
Trump’s self-centered economic policies, however, have complex implications for international trade. Countries like India and Vietnam, both of which aspire to expand their manufacturing capabilities, could face increased competition as Trump moves to make the United States an even more attractive hub for global trade . This protectionist stance also raises questions about tariffs and trade disputes, notably with India, which Trump has previously criticized as a “tariff abuser.” Balancing trade with India will be essential, especially as the two democracies aim to deepen their strategic partnership and push trade figures beyond the current level of $118 billion, with the goal of reaching $1 trillion in the long term.
In the area of global finance, Trump is also likely to review policies surrounding the role of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency. The decision to exclude Russia from the SWIFT system in recent years has diminished the credibility of the dollar as a reserve currency, motivating BRICS countries to seek alternatives such as a common currency. Trump’s position on the SWIFT system could mark a change, perhaps even reopening the possibility of Russian reintegration if it aligns with US economic interests, thereby strengthening the stability of the dollar on the global stage. Additionally, Trump’s approach to cryptocurrencies and digital finance may evolve, as these technologies represent both an opportunity and a challenge. Although it could legitimize cryptocurrencies with certain regulations, transitioning to them domestically without compromising financial stability would remain a complex undertaking.
Finally, Trump’s focus on overhauling America’s media and information channels speaks to a broader shift in public discourse. Elon Musk’s ownership of This platform, under Musk’s leadership, promotes unfiltered public expression, a dynamic that resonates with Trump’s base, many of whom feel disenfranchised by mainstream media narratives. This move toward digital media is likely to further decentralize public discourse, pushing more Americans to turn to platforms like X for direct information over traditional media.
Trump’s return to the White House represents a renewed focus on American self-reliance, strategic pragmatism in foreign policy, and a transformation in public discourse. Whether improving regulatory effectiveness, restructuring America’s alliances, or managing complex relationships with global powers like China, Trump’s policies are intended to redefine America’s role in an increasingly multipolar world. His approach could lead to significant changes in global trade, security and financial networks, with long-term impacts likely to reverberate beyond his presidency. The return of Trump and his administration underscores a global trend of rising populism and demand for strong, direct leadership – an echo of the United States that could resonate in democracies in Europe and Asia .
Further reading on international electronic relations