The New York Times requires the federal judge to reject Justin’s appearance lawsuit against the paper for its role in publishing a bomb report that ignited his legal battle with Blake Lily. I accused the Doni times in coordination with Livly and the public relations team in the December 21 article entitled “We can bury anyone”: inside the Hollywood distortion machine “revealed that the actress had submitted a complaint with civil rights accusing her” that he ends with us “the director of panic. This article also included allegations that in the blog and its representatives participated in a detailed effort to discredit Livly’s reputation in revenge after it raised its concerns about his behavior in the group.
In his file, he accuses the Times of Bunny, his company Warter and his public relations team from trying to “withdraw times to their greatest hostility with vital” and claims that the paper only “participates (D) in the news census and publishing an article and video clip about the vibrant/vibrant conflict.” At the end of the deposit, the paper argues that a debt suit and her colleagues “tell a one -sided story that got a lot of titles, but” The Times “does not belong to this conflict.”
“As this issue appears, this issue was not supposed to be brought against the New York Times. Blake Levli raised serious concerns about the way it was treated in the group and after the film was released. We did exactly what the news organizations should do: the audience informed us of the complaint that I submitted to the Civil Laws in California. With the wrong inferior against the Times – skepticism about our morals, in an attempt to discredit our reports, to file a baseless lawsuit – that will not control us. ”
A spokesperson for the blog has not immediately responded to the suspension requests.
However, a Lively spokesman issued a statement to support the Times’s proposal, saying that the paper “correctly calls Justin’s claim to the blogging of what it is: a preventive public relations document that has no work in a legal court.”
The statement continues, quoting the modified complaint of Levli: “For years, he urged the men to listen to and believe in women. Their claims that are indisputable for what they are.
Earlier this month, the Balouni team modified their initial complaints to argue that the descriptive data on the Times shows that the paper managed to reach the civil rights complaint in Lively at least 11 days before its initial story. A case was filed with a debt of $ 250 million against the Times on the same day that a lawsuit was filed against Baldouni, in addition to advertising and energy. On January 16, Wayfarer was running. After two weeks, he added times as a defendant.
It was released last summer, “It ends with us,” and it is a drama for the flower seller who is in an abusive relationship with the neurosurgery, and it became one of the largest songs of the year, and I got more than 350 million dollars.
This article was updated with a statement from Lively spokesman, to support the New York Times proposal to dismiss.
